{"id":7008,"date":"2018-07-20T23:55:44","date_gmt":"2018-07-20T20:55:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/?p=7008"},"modified":"2018-08-21T08:08:09","modified_gmt":"2018-08-21T05:08:09","slug":"faradelegea-calin-bandaj","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/?p=7008","title":{"rendered":"F\u0103r\u0103delegea lui C\u0103lin &#8211; Bandaj"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/image-3-e1525727037875.jpeg\" data-rel=\"lightbox-image-0\" data-rl_title=\"\" data-rl_caption=\"\" title=\"\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-6751 lazyload\" data-src=\"http:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/image-3-300x200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" src=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 300px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 300\/200;\" \/><noscript><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-6751\" src=\"http:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/image-3-300x200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/noscript><\/a><br \/>\n    Stau. \u0218i stau. \u0218i c\u00e2te nu se-nt\u00e2mpl\u0103.<br \/>\n    E antonimie toat\u0103 ziua. ,,&#8230; s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219e\u0219te&#8230; inac\u021biuni&#8230;&#8221;, face nef\u0103cute&#8230;. Cine m\u0103 contrazice-i tai nasul! \u00cen locul deciziei cu cifr\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 o sut\u0103 satanic\u0103 \u00een Monitorul Oficial, 566, urmat\u0103 de o dat\u0103 din seria marilor profe\u021bii, 17.07.2017, de neconstitu\u021bionalitate a p\u0103r\u021bii de mijloc din Al. 1, Art. 35, ,,&#8230; \u0219i \u00eempotriva aceluia\u0219i subiect pasiv&#8230;&#8221;, m\u0103 legam de logica existen\u021bei inexisten\u021bei, care dep\u0103\u0219e\u0219te o chestiune nepalpabil\u0103, voin\u021ba. Dar, s\u0103 citim pe de-a-ntregul: ,,Infrac\u021biunea este continuat\u0103 c\u00e2nd o persoan\u0103 s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219e\u0219te la diferite intervale de timp, dar \u00een realizarea aceleia\u0219i rezolu\u021bii \u0219i \u00eempotriva aceluia\u0219i subiect pasiv, ac\u021biuni sau inac\u021biuni care prezint\u0103, fiecare \u00een parte, con\u021binutul aceleia\u0219i infrac\u021biuni.&#8221; Doar ardelenii puteau cere scoaterea sintagmei, cei din Arad. Nu trebuia o parainstan\u021b\u0103 pentru corec\u021bie, subiec\u021bii pasivi, dac\u0103 nu sunt defini\u021bi cu precizie, r\u0103m\u00e2n ceea ce literalmente \u00eenseamn\u0103, inactivi. \u00cen com\u0103, dormind&#8230;. Sau simple statui. Mai cur\u00e2nd umblau la ,,rezolu\u021bii&#8221;, ce din punct de vedere juridic \u00eenseamn\u0103 ,,desfiin\u021bare retroactiv\u0103 a unui contract cu executare&#8230;&#8221;, restul \u00een\u021belesurilor fiind la fel de nepotrivite, ,,hot\u0103r\u00e2re&#8230;&#8221;, ,,rezolvare pe care cel \u00een drept&#8230;&#8221; Cine s\u0103 dea drept infractorului? Articolul 35 are o titulatur\u0103 care, la fel, ar fi putut renun\u021ba la ,,unitatea&#8230;&#8221;, l\u0103s\u00e2nd scris doar infrac\u021biunea continuat\u0103 \u0219i complex\u0103. Asta descriu \u0219i alineatele, cele dou\u0103 situa\u021bii, una \u00een care pe buc\u0103\u021bele ajunge la acela\u0219i rezultat imputabil, condamnabil \u0219i a doua, din Al. 2, ce acumuleaz\u0103 fapte penale diferite din ,,&#8230; o ac\u021biune sau o inac\u021biune care constituie prin ea \u00eens\u0103\u0219i o fapt\u0103 prev\u0103zut\u0103 de legea penal\u0103.&#8221;<br \/>\n     Pentru ele un spor de pedeaps\u0103, continuata poate primi \u00een plus la Al. 1 ,,&#8230; cel mult 3 ani&#8230;&#8221; sau o treime \u00een cazul amenzii. Al. 2 este ilogic, infrac\u021biunea complex\u0103 a fost deja definit\u0103, mai multe pentru \u00eemplinirea uneia. Atunci, cum ,,&#8230; se sanc\u021bioneaz\u0103 cu pedeapsa prev\u0103zut\u0103 de lege pentru acea infrac\u021biune.&#8221;? Chiar Al. 3 recunoa\u0219te, \u00eent\u0103re\u0219te sesizarea mea, \u00eens\u0103, folose\u0219te numai dou\u0103 planuri, unul principal \u0219i unul secundar, \u00een cazul gravit\u0103\u021bii sporite al lui se aplic\u0103 penalizarea pentru infrac\u021biunea complex\u0103 consumat\u0103 de la Al. 2. Sunt confuz. Apare \u00eenc\u0103 un termen, ,,inten\u021bie dep\u0103\u0219it\u0103&#8221;, neexplicat. \u0218i o complexitate de doar dou\u0103 p\u0103r\u021bi. Chestiune inexistent\u0103 \u00een Art. 35.<br \/>\n    Aceea\u0219i confirmare \u00een continuare. Art. 37, referitor la g\u0103sirea altor vinov\u0103\u021bii, componente ale infrac\u021biunii, fie continuat\u0103, fie complex\u0103, dup\u0103 judecare, bine, m\u0103 \u00eentreb cum \u0219i-au f\u0103cut treaba anchetatorii \u0219i judec\u0103torii dac\u0103 nu le-au descoperit anterior verdictului, con\u021bine aceea\u0219i sintagm\u0103 deja utilizat\u0103, ,,&#8230; ac\u021biuni sau inac\u021biuni&#8230;&#8221;, ce exced clar cadrul minimal \u0219i neobligatoriu al cifrei doi. Ce scoate \u00een eviden\u021b\u0103? Lipsa de indulgen\u021b\u0103, sentin\u021ba ,,&#8230; nu poate fi mai u\u0219oar\u0103 dec\u00e2t cea pronun\u021bat\u0103 anterior.&#8221;<br \/>\n     Dac\u0103 n-o s\u0103 v\u0103 distreze numele articolului 38, ,,Concursul de infrac\u021biuni&#8221;, Al. 1 f\u0103r\u0103 \u00eendoial\u0103 va smulge m\u0103car un z\u00e2mbet pentru soiul inventic al unui nou limbaj rom\u00e2nesc: ,,Exist\u0103 concurs real de infrac\u021biuni c\u00e2nd dou\u0103 sau mai multe infrac\u021biuni au fost s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219ite de aceea\u0219i persoan\u0103&#8230;&#8221; Niciun deranj, numai s\u0103 se cear\u0103 Academiei Rom\u00e2ne acordul pentru \u00eenscrierea \u00eentre sintagmele de uz larg, altfel, ca beneficiar de drept al legisla\u021biei, \u00eemi asum orice fel de decodare, printre ele cea \u00een care ,,real&#8221; \u00eent\u0103re\u0219te sensul ,,concursului de infrac\u021biuni&#8221; \u0219i conduce direct la sensul ,,\u00eentrecere&#8221;&#8230;. Care? Se concureaz\u0103 pe sine? S\u0103 vede\u021bi \u00eens\u0103 continuarea. Situa\u021bia are loc ,,&#8230; prin ac\u021biuni sau inac\u021biuni distincte&#8230;&#8221;, am eu ceva cu nefacerea asta&#8230;, ,,\u00eenainte de a fi condamnat\u0103 definitiv pentru vreuna dintre ele.&#8221; M\u0103 \u00eentorc la infrac\u021biunea complex\u0103. Constitutiv\u0103 sau element circumstan\u021bial agravant, una plus cea final\u0103 la mine fac dou\u0103 \u0219i le-a\u0219 condamna evident pe ambele. De aici dilema. La concurs ac\u021biuni, deci mai multe de pedepsit, la complex\u0103 ac\u021biune, dar cel pu\u021bin dubl\u0103 vina. Parc\u0103-i un picule\u021b de echivoc. Apoi, ,,Exist\u0103 concurs real de infrac\u021biuni \u0219i atunci c\u00e2nd una dintre infrac\u021biuni a fost comis\u0103 pentru s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219irea sau ascunderea altei infrac\u021biuni.&#8221; Oare mai era nevoie de addendum? Asta-i c\u00e2nd realizatorul este de\u0219tept, iar utilizatorul nu poate dep\u0103\u0219i stadiul piciorului de broasc\u0103. Dup\u0103 viziunea d\u00e2n\u0219ilor legislatori. Ia s\u0103 lua\u021bi una bucat\u0103 ,,inac\u021biune&#8221; \u0219i s-o analiza\u021bi la s\u00e2nge, s\u0103-mi spune\u021bi cu\u021bu dac\u0103 n-o fi identic\u0103 sau apropiat\u0103 ,,&#8230; \u00eemprejur\u0103rilor \u00een care au avut loc sau a urm\u0103rilor pe care le-au produs&#8230;&#8221; ac\u021biunile infractorului, \u00eenc\u00e2t forma de ,,concurs formal de infrac\u021biuni&#8221; s\u0103 nu-\u0219i g\u0103seasc\u0103 \u00eentrebuin\u021bare \u0219i s\u0103 ocupe spa\u021biul alineatului 2.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Stau. \u0218i stau. \u0218i c\u00e2te nu se-nt\u00e2mpl\u0103. E antonimie toat\u0103 ziua. ,,&#8230; s\u0103v\u00e2r\u0219e\u0219te&#8230; inac\u021biuni&#8230;&#8221;, face nef\u0103cute&#8230;. Cine m\u0103 contrazice-i tai<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":6751,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"video_url":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2,315,1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7008"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7008"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7008\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7009,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7008\/revisions\/7009"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6751"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7008"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7008"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7008"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}