{"id":25002,"date":"2025-10-14T22:55:49","date_gmt":"2025-10-14T19:55:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/?p=25002"},"modified":"2025-10-14T22:55:49","modified_gmt":"2025-10-14T19:55:49","slug":"faradelegea-lui-calin-at-the-first-point","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/?p=25002","title":{"rendered":"F\u0103r\u0103delegea lui C\u0103lin &#8211; At the first point"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>         Ne \u00eenv\u00e2rtim dup\u0103 cuvinte. Zi-i ilegalitate.<br \/>\n        Caducit\u0103\u021bii. Degeaba ai avut temei legal s\u0103 faci \u0219i s\u0103 dregi, s\u0103 c\u00e2nt\u0103re\u0219ti \u0219i s\u0103 decizi. Termenul avut la dispozi\u021bie, ca mai \u00eenainte la 567, ori&#8230;. Judecat\u0103 i-o fi numele acestui set de ascult\u0103ri \u0219i decizii, \u00eens\u0103 mie mi se pare prea mult pentru o arbitrare nu la fel de riguroas\u0103, nu \u00eentru totul profesional\u0103, nu cu puteri precum ale instan\u021bei. Mai apoi. Al. 1, pe modelul completului de judecat\u0103, invit\u0103 p\u0103r\u021bile, \u201eLa primul termen&#8230;\u201d \u201e&#8230; s\u0103 invoce caducitatea arbitrajului.\u201d. Nu doresc s\u0103 scot \u00een eviden\u021b\u0103 chestiunea cuv\u00e2ntului, de\u0219i r\u0103m\u00e2n la p\u0103rerea c\u0103 el apar\u021bine documentelor, deciziilor, nu modului de arbitrare \u0219i nici acestei alternative la dezamorsarea unui conflict, la fixarea unei st\u0103ri de fapt \u00eentre dou\u0103 p\u0103r\u021bi, ci a\u0219teptarea unui moment pentru&#8230; nimic. La ce s\u0103 mai lunge\u0219ti boala \u0219i pentru ce? Nu s-a emis niciun act, nu s-a \u00eentreprins nicio ac\u021biune care s\u0103 vizeze p\u0103r\u021bile. Doar s-a constituit tribunalul arbitrilor, chestiune \u00eencuviin\u021bat\u0103, dup\u0103 tot setul de \u201emesaje\u201d schimbate \u00eentre unii \u0219i al\u021bii c\u0103 \u201etreaba\u201d poate \u00eencepe. Chiar dac\u0103 Al. 1 spune ceva, Al. 2 poart\u0103 discu\u021biile \u00een jurul dep\u0103\u0219irii termenului de \u0219ase luni sau 6+3 luni maxim, c\u0103 acesta ar fi motivul cererii de caducitate. M\u0103 mai mir de faptul c\u0103 doi \u201eoameni\u201d, persoane \u0219i, \u0219i, pot l\u0103sa vremea s\u0103 treac\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 se \u00eengrijoreze de o parte din soarta lor, de o parte dintre problemelor lor \u0219i s\u0103 a\u0219tepte jum\u0103tate de an, cel pu\u021bin, pentru a fi chema\u021bi la o prim\u0103 \u0219edin\u021b\u0103. \u0218i sunt uimit c\u0103 tot tribunalul&#8230; d\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2re \u00een privin\u021ba caducului arbitraj. \u0218i plusez cu \u00eenc\u0103 o chestiune aruncat\u0103 \u00een Al. 2 gratuit. O excep\u021bie ce se putea constitui \u00een alt alineat sau chiar articol. De la ce premis\u0103 plecase Al. 1? Invocare de caducitate. \u0218i ce caut\u0103 c\u0103 p\u0103r\u021bile renun\u021b\u0103 la caducitate? Se joac\u0103 cu cererile, cu timpul, cu persoanele desemnate ca arbitri? Al. 3&#8230;. \u0102sta este \u201eblestem\u201d sintactico-morfologico-literar. P\u0103i, se \u021bine toat\u0103 \u0219edin\u021ba \u0219i la final declara\u021bia de caducitate este pus\u0103 pe tapet sau nici n-apuc\u0103 bine s\u0103 se r\u0103ceasc\u0103 prezent\u0103rile, c\u0103ci a\u0219a este corect \u0219i legal, \u0219i p\u0103r\u021bile \u201e\u021bip\u0103\u201d c\u0103 lor li se pare c\u0103 arbitrajul ar putea s\u0103-\u0219i fi pierdut temeiul legal? \u0218i care probe administrate, c\u00e2nd Al. 2 \u201eurl\u0103\u201d de termenele dep\u0103\u0219ite? Art. 568.<br \/>\n         Locul&#8230;. Unde vor p\u0103r\u021bile. Unde vrea arbitrajul. Art. 569.<br \/>\n        Limba&#8230;. A contractului, a litigiului, a conven\u021biei arbitrale. Sau una \u201e&#8230; de circula\u021bie interna\u021bional\u0103 la hot\u0103r\u00e2rea tribunalului. Ori fiecare parte cu a sa \u0219i cu un traduc\u0103tor. Art. 570.<br \/>\n        Crezusem&#8230;. C\u0103 \u00eenainte era cererea, c\u0103 apoi urmeaz\u0103 formarea tribunalului. C-a\u0219a a fost la mine. \u00cent\u00e2i pl\u00e2ngerea. Comisia-tribunal (poli\u021bienesc) urm\u0103toarea. Altfel care ar fi motivul \u00eentemeierii celui arbitral? Totu\u0219i&#8230;. Mai \u00eent\u00e2i tribunalul, de\u0219i exist\u0103 deja litigiul. Dup\u0103 cererea. Nume&#8230;. Ale p\u0103r\u021bilor, ale reprezentan\u021bilor &#8211; care are -, conven\u021bia arbitral\u0103 \u00een copie, obiect \u0219i valoare cerere, cu calcul cu tot, explicat, motive \u0219i probe, cine \u0219i unde la arbitri, semn\u0103turi de p\u0103r\u021bi. Art. 571.<br \/>\n         Iar sunt confuz. La Art. 572 avem doar un reclamant, nu dou\u0103 p\u0103r\u021bi care au semnat o singur\u0103 cerere. Desigur, fiec\u0103rui, \u0219i a\u0219a, c\u00e2te o copie dup\u0103 ea \u0219i dup\u0103 \u00eenscrisurile ata\u0219ate.<br \/>\n         \u00cent\u00e2mpinarea, cum o \u0219ti\u021bi, din partea p\u00e2r\u00e2tului, cu toate cele la \u0219i-n alte asemenea cazuri. Aidoma \u0219i cele uitate, de \u00eenf\u0103\u021bi\u0219at la primul&#8230;. Prima \u00eentrevedere a tribunalului arbitral cu p\u0103r\u021bile. Tot tu-i pui \u0219i ei&#8230;. M\u0103car cel al p\u00e2r\u00e2tului s\u0103-i \u021bin\u0103 un pic partea p\u00e2r\u00e2tului, nu s\u0103-i spun\u0103 de la obraz, el \u0219i \u201ecolegii\u201d c\u0103 de nu aduce \u00eent\u00e2mpinarea, am\u00e2n\u0103 solu\u021bia \u0219i mai este \u0219i bun de plat\u0103 la cheltuieli. Art. 573.<br \/>\n         \u0218i ultimul, din lunga list\u0103 extras\u0103 acum vreo dou\u0103 luni \u00een urm\u0103, Art. 574. P\u00e2r\u00e2tul, \u0219i el \u00een drept s\u0103 emit\u0103 preten\u021bii \u0219i cerere reconven\u021bional\u0103. A\u0219a ne \u00eentoarcem, pe alte c\u0103i \u0219i cu al\u021bi oameni, dar cu acelea\u0219i metode la lungul \u0219ir de norme \u0219i proceduri din cadrul unei instan\u021be judec\u0103tore\u0219ti. Bine c\u0103 articolul nu le-a mai \u0219i enumerat.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ne \u00eenv\u00e2rtim dup\u0103 cuvinte. Zi-i ilegalitate. Caducit\u0103\u021bii. Degeaba ai avut temei legal s\u0103 faci \u0219i s\u0103 dregi, s\u0103 c\u00e2nt\u0103re\u0219ti \u0219i<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":10240,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"video_url":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2,315],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25002"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25002"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25002\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25003,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25002\/revisions\/25003"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/10240"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ziarulderimnic.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}